Comments on:

By: hope

hope — Wed, 29 Nov 2017 01:01:07 +0000

.@jack Will test but not if I have to install something. Lol I'm too much of a purist for that.

By: jack

jack — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:29:32 +0000

@kulturnation That's a good thought, thanks.

By: kulturnation

kulturnation — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:23:35 +0000

@jack Just rethinking my experience: Maybe if it would have said „We have found some nice gifts already - wanna see?“ I would have checked them. And if there was not enough of the „right" stuff I would have continued, if offered.

By: kulturnation

kulturnation — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:25:00 +0000

@jack I saw the „Hurry“ but, of course, I wanted to have the perfect gift :)

By: jack

jack — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:20:50 +0000

@kulturnation I had the same complaint about the pet-related gifts. It's tricky, but I agree. Yes, it can be a bit long getting through. We recently added the "Hurry!" option :). Thanks for the feedback!

By: kulturnation

kulturnation — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:52:05 +0000

@jack Lost patience in between but went on until the end. Results after answering "Cat person": a lot of real cat related gifts - the person has no cat :(

By: jack

jack — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:47:38 +0000

@adamprocter Thanks for taking a look. Good point about needing a bit more granularity. Scoring the gifts can be tricky so we started with things a bit on the binary side.

By: adamprocter

adamprocter — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:37:39 +0000

@jack I had a go the results where pretty good and in the end I did select one of the suggestions, I found it fun and seemed to work, A couple of the questions I would have liked some more granularity or a not applicable. for example the alcohol questions were very binary